|
Our Detailed Methodology
| 
Data collected in the 2000 National Annenberg
Election Survey and an in-depth discussion of the method is available
in Capturing Campaign Dynamics from Oxford University
Press.
Romer, D., Kenski, K., Waldman, P., Adasiewicz,
C., & Jamieson, K. H. (2004). Capturing Campaign Dynamics:
The National Annenberg Election Survey. Oxford: New York.
Forthcoming: Richard Johnston, Michael G.
Hagen, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, The Dynamics of Election: The
2000 Presidential Campaign and the Foundation of Party Politics.
Cambridge University Press, 2004. This is the first comprehensive
analysis of the 2000 campaign drawn from the NAES 2000 data set. |
In addition to its large sample size, the National
Annenberg Election Survey (NAES) is distinctive because it employs a rolling
cross-section (RCS) design. With this method, random samples of respondents
are interviewed each day of the presidential campaign period in such a
way that the samples are comparable from one day to the next. Specifically,
the composition of each day's interviews is balanced on various demographics
characteristics. Daily interviews can thus be used to identify trends
and points of change in the public's reactions to political events as
they unfold over the course of the presidential campaign.
The RCS design is a series of repeated cross-sections
collected with a rigorous sampling plan. This sampling plan works to ensure
that each of the repeated cross-sections is composed of randomly selected
members from the population under study. In the case of the NAES, the
design is used to gather cross-sections of randomly selected adults in
the United States during the presidential campaign. Because the composition
of each cross-section is random, researchers can treat the date of interview
as a chance event. Because the date of interview can be treated as a chance
event, researchers can analyze the data as a single cross-section or a
time series.
The date of interview is a central concern of the
RCS design. The NAES rolling cross-sectional design uses "day" as the
unit for the interviewing schedule in order to capture campaign dynamics
and attribute changes in public opinion to particular campaign events.
Unlike typical polls that release potential telephone numbers into the
field at one time, the NAES design calls for a release of a set number
of "replicates" (random subsamples of the sampled telephone numbers) for
interviewing each night to ensure that each daily cross-section is truly
random.
Strict procedures have been worked out so that
each telephone number has the same chance of being selected and of producing
a completed interview as any other telephone number. Serious effort has
been made to increase the response rates without compromising the assumption
underlying a random sample. For example, people who are initially called
on a weekend are not pursued more aggressively than people who are initially
called on weekdays. The NAES follows a special protocol so that the sample
of respondents interviewed on any single day will be as representative
of the population as possible.
The 2004 NAES uses the same protocol used in 2000.
The interviewing for 2004 is being conducted by Schulman, Ronca, Bucuvalas,
Inc. In the 2000 NAES, a total of eighteen call attempts were made for
every telephone number that was released into the field. The call backs
took place over a period of two weeks. If it was determined that a telephone
number was out of service or was a non-residential number, interviews
at that number were not pursued. After a telephone number was released
into the field, call attempts were made as follows:
- Days 1-4: 2 attempts each day
- Days 5-14: 1 attempt each day
There was also a refusal conversion protocol. If
a respondent made an initial refusal on days 1 through 6 from the phone
number's release into the field, then the person was called back for potential
conversion four days from the initial refusal. If the initial refusal
was made on days 7 through 9, then the person was called back on day 10.
If the initial refusal took place on days 10 through 13, then the respondent
was called back for conversion the next day. And finally, if the initial
refusal took place on day 14, then a callback for conversion was made
on the same day. If a completed interview did not take place after 14
days of a telephone number having been released into the field, no further
contact was initiated.
What is important to note here is that there are
strict procedures in place so that no telephone number is treated differently
from any of the other numbers selected. Telephone numbers released into
the field on Tuesdays are not handled differently from telephone numbers
released on Fridays. This protocol ensures that the probability of being
interviewed is a random event. From prior research, we know that people
who answer a survey on the first call attempt tend to answer differently
from those who are not reached until the eighteenth call attempt. By stabilizing
the proportion of respondents who completed an interview after having
been called only a few times and those who completed an interview after
being called numerous times, the representativeness of the daily cross-sections
is maximized.
|